Breakdown of our Presentation:
Overall questions:
- What is the invisible event/entity/pattern we are going to make visible? (Q2)
- To what extent does it pre-exist our making it visible? To what extend are we 'creating' it via making it visible? Or both? (Q3)
- What different does it make to publish such a visualisation? (Q4)
- In which publics does such a visualisation intervene? (Q4)
Presentation tasks:
1. research the nature of contemporary visualisation (Task 1 - Delia)
2. main task: make something invisible visible
(a) choose and research some data of interest (Task 2 - Emma)
(b) research and then choose techniques of visualisation (Task 3 - Charlotte)
3. produce visualisation (Task 3 - Charlotte)
(a) 'explain' the phenomenon that we have researched (Task 4 - Emma)
(b) demonstrate understanding of the relationship between visualisation and information (Task - Delia)
4. Understand the way this visualisation, published, would make a difference to both publishing itself (difference between publishing a visualisation and, for example, some written commentary by a journalist), and to the publics to which the visualisation is addressed to. (Task - Jess)
5. Discuss the issues involved, and evaluate the strengths and limits of the work we've done (Task - Jess)
Powerpoint compiling everything together: (Task 8 - Delia)
- 10 slides
- 5mins
Criteria for this Assessment Task
- Demonstrated understanding of the processes and impacts (upon both publishing and publics) of visualisation.
- Specific research of both a data set and a/some visualisation technique(s)
- Creative use of the technique in relation to the data set.
- Ability to discuss the issues involved, and evaluate the strengths and limits of the work the group has done.
- Ability to respond creatively and imaginatively, as a group, to another group’s work. Your group give a constructive and detailed response (that is, not “we liked it, thought it was interesting, enjoyed it”, ‘it was fresh/lame” “we didn’t like it, etc” )
Title Page |
1. The Nature of Contemporary Visualisation |
2. Data and Statistics |
3. Researched Techniques of Visualisation |
4. Our Visualisation |
5. To What Extent Does It Already Exist? |
6. Explanation of Chosen Phenomenon |
7. The Relationship Between Visualisation and Information |
8. How Would Our Visualisation Make A Difference To Publishing? |
9. How Would Our Visualisation Make A Difference To Publishing? |
10. Our Strengths and Limits |
Critical Feedback for Group 4 - Music and Emotions:
Criteria for this Assessment Task - music and emotion
1. Demonstrated understanding of the
processes and impacts of visualisation (publics and publishing)
oNeeded
more focus further than the three mentioned
o
Could
have focused more on how this research could affect audience in the public
sphere, and the subsequent composers who publish this music
o
Also
what difference it makes publishing this data
o
But
the topic was really creative
o
Successfully
made the invisible visible
2. Specific research of both a data set
and some visualisation technique
· Colours, emotions, weather –
specific research used
· Researched data, a sufficient amount
of people for this project – they could have done more, but they mentioned this
in their limitations
3. Creative use of the technique in
relation to the data set.
· The use of colour is interesting to
relate to these categories – perhaps would’ve been better if the pictures were
coded to the colour when observing the visualisation
· Could have been more creative
· Emoticon faces they didn’t use,
which would have been good
· Too many variables
4. Ability to
discuss the issues involved, and evaluate the strengths and limits of the work
the group has done.
· Did have an understanding of their
strengths and limitations, especially limitations in reference to accuracy of
their data
· Recreate the emotional experience
· Limitations: very subjective,
different people feel different things
No comments:
Post a Comment